Google’s Zero Moment of Truth

If you are old enough to remember buying things before Google—and I am—you may remember that the process was rather different.

You might see an advert, visit a shop, look at what was available and make your decision there. You could ask friends or read a magazine, of course, but you couldn’t stand in the middle of the shop and instantly discover what hundreds of strangers thought about the product.

Today, checking online before buying something feels so normal that we barely notice we are doing it. For many younger buyers, it is the only way they have ever known.

In 2011, Google gave this online research stage a name: the Zero Moment of Truth, or ZMOT.

It sounds like a major philosophical event. In reality, it is the moment when you look something up before deciding whether to buy it.

Before there was a Zero Moment

Marketing people do love giving grand names to perfectly ordinary things.

Before Google introduced the Zero Moment of Truth, there were already two other “moments of truth.”

First came the stimulus. You saw an advert, noticed a product or simply realised that you needed something.

Then came the First Moment of Truth. This was the moment you stood in front of the shelf, looked at the available products and decided which one to buy. Procter & Gamble introduced the expression in 2005.

The Second Moment of Truth came later, when you took the product home and used it. Did it work? Were you pleased with it? Would you buy it again?

The process was fairly simple:

You became interested. You chose something. You tried it.

Of course, people did not always follow the official marketing process.

My dad had his own version of the Zero Moment of Truth. He waited for my uncle to buy another expensive new car, then bought the old one from him.

Then the internet came along and inserted another stage.

The moment before the First Moment

Google realised that people were no longer arriving at the shelf knowing nothing about the choices in front of them.

Imagine that you see an advert for a coffee machine. Instead of going directly to the shop, you look it up online first.

Is it any good? Is it easy to clean? Are the capsules expensive? What do people who already own one say about it? Is there another machine that would be better?

You may watch a video, read several reviews and compare prices. You might decide that you definitely want it. You might choose a completely different machine—or decide that you don’t need one after all.

All of that happens before the First Moment of Truth—before you reach the shelf or click the Buy button.

That is why Google called it the Zero Moment of Truth. It comes before the first one.

And then it starts again

The process does not end when somebody buys the product.

They take it home and use it—the Second Moment of Truth.

If they love it, they may leave a glowing review, recommend it to friends or share it online. If they hate it, they may do exactly the same thing, only rather less glowingly.

Those comments then become part of the next person’s research.

The review you write after buying your coffee machine may be read six months later by somebody standing in a shop trying to decide whether to buy the same one.

Your Second Moment of Truth has become part of their Zero Moment of Truth.

And round it goes.

Does the Zero Moment of Truth still matter?

The expression may have aged—but the behaviour has not.

Google’s original ZMOT material now sits in its archive, and you do not hear the term very often. But looking things up before buying them has become so normal that we no longer need a special name for it.

The biggest difference is that the research no longer happens in one place.

We might search Google, look at a company’s website, check its reviews, watch a video, ask for recommendations on social media or use an AI tool to help us understand the choices.

We may do this several times, on different devices and over several days or weeks.

So perhaps the only part that feels outdated is the word “moment.” It is no longer one distinct moment between seeing something and buying it.

It has become part of the entire decision.

What does this mean for your business?

By the time somebody contacts you, they may already have spent quite a while getting to know your business. They have looked at your website, read your reviews and compared you with several other companies. They may know what you do, how long you have been doing it and what previous customers think of you. Or they may have looked at your website and decided not to contact you at all. That is the important part. Your first contact with a potential customer is not necessarily the telephone call, email or enquiry form. It may be the moment your business appears in a search result, the first page they visit on your website or the review they read about you. You are already making an impression before you know they exist.

Does the ZMOT apply to everything?

Of course not. The Zero Moment of Truth doesn’t apply to LEGO. LEGOs are just awesome. End of.

So, does it still matter?

The Zero Moment of Truth was Google’s name for a new buying habit.

Fifteen years later, it no longer feels new. Researching something online before buying it is simply what we do.

The expression may eventually disappear altogether. That does not make the idea behind it any less useful.

People are forming opinions about a business long before they make contact. What they find—or fail to find—will influence whether that contact ever happens.

The Zero Moment of Truth is still there.

We have just stopped noticing it.

Table of Contents

Share this article